But it didn`t take long for the feeling, which we generally know, «something in return for something else» – the OED says it is mentioned for the first time in a 1560 legal document, which also appears in the OED. Since then, she has kept that meaning. Another meaning of the phrase «someone who pretends to be someone he is not» apparently died out before 1700. But both ideas would be expressed in Latin by quid pro quo — or that`s what scientists think. This sentence does not appear in a huge corpus of classical Latin texts, compiled by the Packhard Humanities Institute, so we cannot really be sure that it was ever used in Latin. If Democrats can prove that Trump made a counter-offer to Ukrainian leaders, Trump could have a problem. Or it doesn`t matter. Quid pro quo is a Latin expression that literally means «something for something» or «for.» We use the term to mean an exchange of goods, services, favors or other valuables. If we talk about several exchanges, we can say quid pro quos. Originally, the term quid pro quo was used in a medical context where it meant replacing one drug with another. People who lived in the first half of the sixteenth century went to a pharmacy to get the medicines they needed, but if they were not available, they would receive a quid pro quo – a substitute. Over time, the meaning of the term has been broadened to encompass all types of exchanges. In the case of a harassment quid pro quo, the victim is not required to prove that the behaviour was strict enough to create an abusive work environment, unlike an anti-fall harassment case.
The Supreme Court has established that employers are responsible for the actions of their employees in sexual harassment cases. Therefore, when a supervisor sexually harasses a quid pro quo worker, the employer (i.e. the company) could be held responsible in addition to the harasser. In the United States, lobbyists have a legal right to support candidates who hold positions with which donors agree or that benefit donors. Such behaviour becomes an act of corruption only if an identifiable exchange between the contribution and official acts, before or after, and the term quid pro quo refers to such an exchange.  As Seipp reminds us, the Constitution says that impeachment is decided by Congress and that Congress is not a courtroom.